[v6test] 2008-02-11 status update

[Thilo Schulz]

On Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008, Kevin Day wrote:
> but even then I'd probably need to go
> through them manually to make sure there were no unintended privacy leaks,
> and I hate publishing what's supposed to be unbiased data if I've manually
> removed parts of it. :)
>
> Because of the nature of the content on the site, I'm being extremely
> careful not to accidentally leak any private information, so I need to
> think about that some more.

Your concern for privacy is admirable and fully justified. I think 
anonymization of data like "top100 referrers" would be o.k. and will not bias 
the data in any way. What I mean was, that one of your goals stated on the 
website is to see whether technically inexperienced people are able to get an 
ipv6 tunnel. To decide on an answer to this question, i.e. data from users 
coming in via slashdot should be weighted differently to data from users 
coming in via, let's say, the nytimes website. If your experiment ever 
happens to make headlines so far :)

-- 
Thilo Schulz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.your.org/pipermail/v6test/attachments/20080215/acb50e17/attachment.bin